Oppo I can't 

"Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero" (sampsonite24) 07/25/2015 at 09:57 • Filed to: None

2

21

be the only one who thinks the Evo X looks better wingless

PS9 > Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero 07/25/2015 at 10:01

11

It’s just wearing formal attire for Mitsubishi’s wake in the U.S. :(

LongbowMkII > Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero 07/25/2015 at 10:03

0

Nice lancer

Supreme Chancellor and Glorious Leader SaveTheIntegras > Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero 07/25/2015 at 10:03

3

I usually like the cleaner look of cars without wings/spoilers...but an Evo without a wing is no Evo in my book

Svend > Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero 07/25/2015 at 10:07

0

On many cars a spoiler is just that.

scoob > Supreme Chancellor and Glorious Leader SaveTheIntegras 07/25/2015 at 10:19

2

Same for STI’s imo.

boxrocket > Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero 07/25/2015 at 10:39

0

Nah, big spoilers look great on lancers. Otherwise they're a bit too generic. This doesn't apply to all cars, notably.

Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero > boxrocket 07/25/2015 at 10:42

1

I think that’s why I like it cause it gives it more of a sleeper status.

PS9 > Svend 07/25/2015 at 10:58

3

You’re just mad because where the spoiler and the decklid are bolted together is the one spot no detalier can clean.

Luke's Dad Sold His 2000TL To Get a Sienna > Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero 07/25/2015 at 11:06

0

I love how handsome a wingless Evo can look, but I need a wing on this.

boxrocket > Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero 07/25/2015 at 11:08

0

They’re uncommon enough that they aren’t really sleepers (at least not the current car with its huge intake).

iSureWilll > Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero 07/25/2015 at 11:09

0

You're not. Evo and STi both look better with no wing. I'm with ya!

Svend > PS9 07/25/2015 at 11:20

1

Who says? Lol. Though yes they can be annoying to clean.

Ford spoilers being the worst so far.

Nobi > scoob 07/25/2015 at 11:35

0

x2
WRX, sure, but it’s not an STi without the wing.

Nobi > Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero 07/25/2015 at 11:36

0

On the VII, VIII, and IX, sure, but the more upright body of the X looks wrong without it.

Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero > Nobi 07/25/2015 at 12:07

0

See I disagree. I think the older evos need the wing to look good. But I don’t know the Evo X just looks so much more grown up without it. With the wing it just screams boy racer

GhostZ > Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero 07/25/2015 at 12:51

0

Yawn

Nobi > Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero 07/25/2015 at 13:01

0

To each their own, but to me it makes it look too much like a base Lancer, and not in the under the radar sleeper effect kind of way.

OPPOsaurus WRX > boxrocket 07/25/2015 at 13:17

0

I think that is true with the new WRX as well

revrseat70 > Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero 07/25/2015 at 14:12

0

Totally agree. A car pretty much has to be a coupe with a certain price tag and level of performance that both justifies the wing and also says “I’m not a ricer, this is an aerodynamic necessity for the high speeds my ____ can go” (insert porsche, lambo, track car here) before I’m ok with a wing. Basically, its only ok on a road car that its very lowest trim level is still a high performance car: porsche 99/GT3 is probably the entry level of acceptable new cars that I can think of.

boxrocket > OPPOsaurus WRX 07/25/2015 at 17:45

0

Agreed. The Impreza and Lancer look naked without spoilers. In contrast, the current Mazda 3 and 6 look weird WITH spoilers.

norskracer98-ExploringTheOutback > Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero 07/27/2015 at 16:29

0

Well the winged model does get one extra MPG on the highway.